...working
the following way:
Imagine some people of the maintance
department of a medium sized mine. Each
one of these people has much knowledge in
his brain and probably around him in the
form of books, papers or computer files.
Each person, too, holds certain views on
how things should run and these views are
not ususally totally compatible with one
another.
Final decisions are taken by Erwin
Spengler, the head of department. He
cannot possibly have enough experience to
satisfactorily assess all the advice
given to him.
But he has a strong sense who should
be listened to in which situation. His
task as team leader consists in deciding
which pieces of knowledge and which
philosophies contribute best to the
solution of which problems. He groups
people to form a team, he can appoint a
team leader, he can organize and control
meetings etc.
He, metaphorically speaking, adjusts
the synapses influencing information flow
within his department in response to
certain questions.
It can easily be imagined how much
problem solving ability can be
represented by the right tuning of the
synapses. Figure out yourself how
valuable it would be
- to know who should first be
consulted in case of an
unexpected breakdown of a
conveyor-belt system,
- to know who should best be
grouped together in a team to
develop a new diagnosis system
based on fuzzy-logic,
- to know whose opinion should be
given more weight in deciding on
the right belt-type.
The weight respective neurons are
given in dealing with certain questions
also reflects knowledge about external
reality. If, for instance, short term
shareholder-value is the main factor
determining company success information
issued by someone like Max Ferguson
should be given more weight than
information issued by Arthur McGregor.
|